The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-30726•McLeod v. Thibodeaux, et al
1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
___________________________
No. 01-30726
___________________________
CARL McLEOD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
MICHAEL THIBODEAUX, SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CLERK OF COURT,
AND
JANE DOE, SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT REPORTER,
Defendants-Appellees.
___________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Louisiana, Lafayette
01-CV-304
___________________________________________________
January, 2, 2002
Before DAVIS, WIENER, AND BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:1
We agree with the district court that this case is barred by
Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). The district court judgment
is therefore
AFFIRMED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.