The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-30191•United States v. Gibson
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30191
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TRENT GIBSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 00-CR-196-1-F
--------------------
December 12, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Trent Gibson has requested
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gibson has not responded to the
motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R.
42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.