United States v. Steinheimer

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-21303
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
versus
DAVID ROSS STEINHEIMER, also known as
David R. Steinheimer, also known as Hotguy Moray,
also known as Steinheimer 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-813-1
--------------------
October 4, 2002
Before JOLLY, PARKER and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel for David Ross Steinheimer has requested leave to
withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Steinheimer has responded to
the motion by filing a motion seeking dismissal of his appeal
without prejudice. His motion for dismissal without prejudice is
DENIED. See FED. R. APP. P. 42(b); 5TH CIR. R. 42.4.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-21303
-2-
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --