United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno

01-21192Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitAug 23, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-21192
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VALENTIN RODRIGUEZ-MORENO,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-61-1
- - - - - - - - - -
August 20, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender representing Valentin Rodriguez-
Moreno has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.