The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-20915•United States v. Garza-Garza
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20915
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROMUALDO GARZA-GARZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-914-1
--------------------
October 7, 2002
Before JONES, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Attorney Jonathan J. Paull, appointed to represent
Romualdo Garza-Garza (“Garza”), has requested leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967). Garza has not responded to the motion. Our independent
review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 01-20915
-2-
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.