United States v. Gonzalez

01-20852Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJun 21, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20852
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FELIX GONZALEZ, JR., also known as Kitty Kitty,
also known as Kitty, also known as Miguel Angel Felix,
also known as Guillermo Garcia, Jr.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-95-CR-142-78
- - - - - - - - - -
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Felix Gonzalez, Jr., has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gonzalez has responded,
requesting to retain his counsel or to have new counsel appointed
to represent him. Gonzalez also argues that one of his prior
convictions was improperly considered at sentencing; his offense
level should not have been increased two points for his playing a
supervisory or managerial role; and he should have been given a

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-20852
-2-
three-level decrease for acceptance of responsibility, rather
than a two-level decrease.
Our independent review of the brief, Gonzalez’ responses,
and the record, including the waiver-of-appeal provision in the
plea agreement, discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.