Edison v. Houston Police Dept

01-20786Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 22, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20786
Conference Calendar
CEDRIC CHRISTOPHER EDISON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
HOUSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CV-1011
--------------------
February 20, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Cedric Christopher Edison, Texas prisoner number 891953,
appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
suit as frivolous because it was barred by the statute of
limitations. He argues that he was denied medical care by prison
officials and that this denial of medical care constitutes a
continuing tort that tolls the applicable two-year statute of
limitations. See Gartrell v. Gaylor, 981 F.2d 254, 256-57 (5th
Cir. 1993); TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 16.003(a)(Vernon Supp.
2002).

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-20786
-2-
Edison has not shown that the district court abused its
discretion in dismissing his suit. Edison’s appeal is without
arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d
215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
The dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal as frivolous
by the district court each count as a “strike” for purposes of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88
(5th Cir. 1996). Edison therefore has two “strikes” under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Edison that once he accumulates
three “strikes,” he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any
civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained
in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious
physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.