The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-20733•United States v. Williams
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20733
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROEMALACE DARNELL WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-105-1
--------------------
April 11, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Roemalace Darnell Williams on
appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Williams has not filed a response to counsel's motion and brief.
Our independent review of the record and brief discloses no
non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.