The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-20527•Pressley, et al v. Sanderson Farms Inc
01-20527Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMar 8, 2002
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-20527
LOUISE PRESSLEY; ET AL,
Plaintiffs,
LOUISE PRESSLEY; TAMMY COURTER;
JAMIE SMITH; GLADYS KILLEREEN;
PEGGY LLOYD; PATRICIA PONDS;
MARLA HUTCHINSON; LILLIE DAVIS;
ESTELLA THOMPSON; EVA MACKLERAY;
KARINA GALVAN,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
DELIA AGUILAR; RAYMUNDO ARREOLA;
TRALISHA BAERGA; BILLY BALDWIN;
CLEMENTINE BELL; ET AL,
Appellants,
versus
SANDERSON FARMS, INC. (Processing Division),
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Texas
(H-00-CV-420)
March 7, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the trial
court.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.