The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-11366•Dean v. Barber, et al
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-11366
Summary Calendar
ANNA LYNNE DEAN,
Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant,
versus
LARRY A. BARBER, Etc; ET AL
Defendants,
LARRY A. BARBER, Individually and in Official Capacity;
RICK ELLIOTT, Individually and in Official Capacity;
DEAN SETTLEMEYER, Individually and in Official Capacity;
KYLE E. NEAL, Individually and in Official Capacity;
ROY E. VAUGHN, Individually and in Official Capacity;
JON KNAPP, Individually and in Official Capacity,
Defendants - Counter Claimants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Northern District of Texas
U.S.D.C. No. 99-CV-160
September 23, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This matter is again before the court following a remand for
-- 1 of 2 --
the limited purpose of obtaining a clarification of the district
court’s judgment awarding costs in favor of the defendants. This
court directed the district court to indicate the basis and reasons
for imposing costs against Anna Lynne Dean, the total amount of the
costs imposed, and whether that amount included attorneys’ fees.
The district court has complied, and we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.