United States v. Wilburn

01-11229Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitApr 10, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-11229
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VALDEZ LAMAR WILBURN, also known
as DERRICK LAMAR WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:00-CR-9-ALL
--------------------
April 10, 2002
Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Valdez Lamar Wilburn appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2). Wilburn filed a timely notice of appeal. See
United States v. Alvarez, 210 F.3d 309, 310 (5th Cir. 2000); FED.
R. APP. P. 25(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
Wilburn argues that Amendment 599, which amends the
Application Notes for U.S.S.G. § 2K2.4, resulted in a change to
the applicable sentencing guidelines, entitling him to a
modification of his sentence. Amendment 599 is inapplicable to

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-11229
-2-
this case. Wilburn’s guideline sentencing range was computed
under § 2K2.1, not § 2K2.4. Therefore, his claims are without
merit. The district court’s judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.