Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-11077
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL RAY SINQUEFIELD,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:00-CR-213-1-E
--------------------
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Ray Sinquefield appeals his conviction following his
guilty plea to possession of methamphetamine with intent to
distribute. He argues that the district court erred when it
ruled that he lacked standing to bring his motion to suppress
evidence. Sinquefield fails to demonstrate that he had an
individual subjective and legitimate expectation of privacy in
the mobile home. Minnesota v. Carter, 525 U.S. 83, 90 (1998);
United States v. Vega, 221 F.3d 789, 795 (5th Cir. 2000), cert.
denied, 531 U.S. 1155 (2001).
AFFIRMED.
-- 1 of 1 --
