Crawford v. City of Richardson

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-11007
Summary Calendar
DANNY O. CRAWFORD,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF RICHARDSON,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(3:98-CV-731-L)
--------------------
August 7, 2002
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Plaintiff-Appellant Danny O. Crawford appeals the district
court’s take-nothing judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee (“the
City”) following a bench trial. Crawford asserts seven issues,
challenging, inter alia, the sufficiency of the evidence to support
the factual findings of the City’s Civil Service Board and the
district court, and the legal conclusions of that court.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
We have reviewed the record on appeal, the appellate briefs of
the parties, and the extensive Memorandum Opinion and Order of the
district court, which fully explicates the operative facts and
pertinent law. We are convinced by our review that the district
court’s thorough disposition of Crawford’s largely meritless case
correctly applied the pertinent law to the material facts.
Essentially for the reasons set forth by the district court in its
comprehensive opinion, the judgment of that court is, in all
respects,
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --