United States v. Williamson

01-10866Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMar 21, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10866
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RANDY LEE WILLIAMSON, doing business as
1st Class Computers, doing business as
Online Connection Services,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:00-CR-127-1-C
--------------------
March 20, 2002
Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES AND CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charles Baruch, appointed counsel for Randy Williamson, has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the brief, the record, and Williamson's response
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel's motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 01-10866
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.