United States v. Perez-Pujol

01-10860Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitJun 21, 2002

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10860
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ORESTE GONZALO PEREZ-PUJOL,
also known as Oreste Gonzalo Perez,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:00-CR-259-1-M
--------------------
June 18, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oreste
Gonzalo Perez-Pujol has requested leave to withdraw as counsel
and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

-- 1 of 2 --

No.
-2-
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.