The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-60066•Stoltz v. City of Biloxi, et al
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-60066
SHANNAN LEE STOLTZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF BILOXI,
Defendant-Appellee.
____________________________
SHANNAN LEE STOLTZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CITY OF BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI;
THOMAS MOFFETT, Individually and
in his Official Capacity as
Director of Public Safety
for the City of Biloxi,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Southern District of Mississippi
(1:98-CV-191-BrR)
December 7, 2000
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
-- 1 of 2 --
2
We have had the benefit of briefs and oral argument by able
counsel in this case. We are not persuaded that the district court
erred in its grant of summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.