Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50974
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CODY LEE CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-00-CR-21-1
--------------------
August 14, 2001
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Cody Lee Clark has requested
leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Clark did not file a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the
appeal is DISMISSED.
-- 1 of 1 --
