Full text
* District Judge of the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by
designation.
** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50739
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID GUY COLLIVER,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
(EP-99-CR-1694)
July 12, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges, and DOWD*,
District Judge.
PER CURIAM:**
We conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motion for continuance. We are also
persuaded that the instruction on deliberate ignorance was
warranted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
-- 1 of 1 --
