Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FIFTH CIRCUIT
_________________
No. 00-50446
(Summary Calendar)
_________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL JON HANNEMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Western District of Texas
USDC No. A-00-CR-9-ALL-SS
January 8, 2002
Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Michael Jon Hanneman appeals from his conviction of making false statements to a firearms
dealer and unlawful receipt and possession of a firearm while subject to a restraining order against
committing family violence. Hanneman contends that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8) violates the Second
-- 1 of 2 --
-2-
Amendment and the Commerce Clause. Section 922(g)(8) does not violate the Second Amendment,
United States v. Emerson, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Oct. 16, 2001), 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 22386,
*146, nor does it violate the Commerce Clause. United States v. Pierson, 139 F.3d 501, 503-04 (5th
Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
