The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-50210•United States v. Pinon-Arzaga
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50210
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LUIS PINON-ARZAGA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-66-CR-366-1
- - - - - - - - - -
October 18, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Luis Pinon-Arzaga appeals from his guilty-plea conviction
for importation of marijuana and possession with intent to
distribute marijuana. He argues that the district court erred by
failing to apply a two-level reduction to his offense level under
U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) for his minor role in his offenses. Whether
a defendant played a mitigating role in an offense as a minor
participant is a sophisticated factual determination that enjoys
the protection of the “clearly erroneous” standard. United
-- 1 of 2 --
No. 00-50210
-2-
States v. Gallegos, 868 F. 2d 711, 713 (5th Cir. 1989) (internal
quotations and citations omitted).
Examination of the facts contained in the record indicate
that the district court’s refusal to apply § 3B1.2(b) to Pinon-
Arzaga’s sentence was not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the
district court’s judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.