The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-50172•United States, et al v. Loarca-Lopez
00-50172Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMar 16, 2001
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50172
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LOARCA-LOPEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. P-99-CR-307-2-F
--------------------
March 15, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Jose Loarca-Lopez (“Loarca”)
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Loarca has received a
copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a
pro se brief of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel
and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel
is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.