Full text
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50043
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARMELO RANGEL,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. DR-99-CR-544(1)
--------------------
June 15, 2000
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appointed counsel for Carmelo Rangel has filed a motion to
withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Rangel has received a copy of counsel’s
motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent
review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
