United States v. Mills

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40081
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN L. MILLS, JR.,
Defendant-
Appellant.
---------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. C-99-CR-231-1
-----------------------------------------------------------
September 28, 2000
Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent John L. Mills, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mills has received a copy
of counsel’s motion and brief. Although he requested and was granted an extension of time to file
a response, Mills failed to file a response to the motion to withdraw. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5TCIR. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --