The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-31056•United States v. Decker
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-31056
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRAD DECKER, SR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 99-CR-50101-3
--------------------
June 7, 2001
Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Brad Decker, Sr., has filed a
motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Decker has not filed a
response.
Our independent review of the brief and the appellate record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused
from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.