United States v. Young

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-31033
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-
Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH CORNELIUS YOUNG, III,
Defendant-
Appellant.
-------------------------------------------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 97-CR-60022-5
--------------------------------------------------------
March 9, 2001
Before JOLLY, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joseph Cornelius Young, III, has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Young was notified of counsel’s motion and brief, and he has filed a pro se
response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Young’s response shows
that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Consequently, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 2 --

No. 00-31033
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --