Clancy v. Empl Hlth Ins Co

00-30853Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 2, 2001

Full text

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under
the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit
No. 00-30853
Summary Calendar
SHAWN S. CLANCY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
VERSUS
EMPLOYERS HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Louisiana
(99-CV-381-N)
February 1, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The district court correctly dismissed Ms. Clancy’s suit
because of her failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The
district court’s judgment is therefore affirmed, essentially for
the reasons stated by the district court in its careful November
24, 1999 Order and Reasons.
AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.