The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-20948•United States v. Macz
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20948
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
EFRAIN MACZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
(H-99-CR-417-3)
--------------------
July 17, 2001
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Efrain Macz has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Macz has not filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion
for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.
R. 42.2.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.