United States v. Chen

00-20179Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitFeb 5, 2001

Full text

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-20179
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
YUNG-MING CHEN, also known as Ah Ju,
also known as Yung Ming Chen,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-99-CR-373-1
--------------------
February 2, 2001
Before GARWOOD, DAVIS and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Yung-Ming Chen has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the
brief, Chen’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.