Murray v. Restor Telephone

00-10806Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitMar 30, 2001

Full text

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this
opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_______________________
No. 00-10806
Summary Calendar
______________________
JOSEPH A. MURRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RESTOR TELEPHONE PRODUCTS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
(3:99-CV-819-H)
March 29, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Joseph Murray appeals the district court’s grant of
summary judgment in favor of Restor Telephone Products. The court
has considered appellant’s position in light of the briefs and
pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we agree with
the district court that Murray failed to provide evidence necessary
to sustain his claims of discrimination under Title VII and we
therefore AFFIRM.
AFFIRMED.

-- 1 of 1 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.