The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-30935•Zaffuto, et al v. City of Hammond
01-30935Court of Appeals for the Fifth CircuitNov 18, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-30935
consolidated with
No. 01-31405
TERRY ZAFFUTO; SUSAN ZAFFUTO,
Plaintiffs - Appellees-Cross-Appellants
versus
CITY OF HAMMOND; ET AL,
Defendants
CITY OF HAMMOND,
Defendants - Appellants-Cross-Appellees;
KENNY CORKERN,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
November 18, 2002
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Because the underlying opinion, Zaffuto v. City of Hammond, 308
F.3d 485 (5th Cir. 2002), reverses in part and remands for a new
trial, the district court’s award of attorney’s fees to plaintiffs
is VACATED. On remand, the district court shall, at the appropriate
time, re-determine whether and to what extent the plaintiffs are
entitled to attorney’s fees.
-- 1 of 2 --
In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.