United States v. Manzo-Cardenas

United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit
____________

No. 25-11226
Summary Calendar
____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Ignacio Manzo-Cardenas,

Defendant—Appellant.
______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:23-CR-82-4
______________________________

Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Richman and Southwick, Circuit
Judges.
Per Curiam:
*

The attorney appointed to represent Ignacio Manzo-Cardenas has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229
(5th Cir. 2011). Manzo-Cardenas has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

*
This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 18, 2026

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Case: 25-11226 Document: 81-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2026

No. 25-11226
2
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Case: 25-11226 Document: 81-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2026