(CR-96-8-F, CA-98-133-4-F) United States of America v. Dennis Ray Gordon

Filed: May 9, 2000
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7594
(CR-96-8-F, CA-98-133-4-F)
United States of America,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
Dennis Ray Gordon,
Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed May 2, 2000, as follows:
On the cover sheet, section 7, line 2 -- attorney Brett Alan
Sagel is deleted from the counsel listing.
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk

-- 1 of 3 --

2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7594
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DENNIS RAY GORDON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at New Bern. James C. Fox, District Judge.
(CR-96-8-F, CA-98-133-4-F)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 2, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Ray Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Ray Gordon seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Gordon, Nos. CR-96-8-F;
CA-98-133-4-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1999). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --