The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-7572•United States of America v. Robert Lee Burris
99-7572Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7572
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT LEE BURRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-240, CA-98-516-3-P)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lee Burris, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lee Burris appeals the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Burris, Nos.
CR-93-240; CA-98-516-3-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.