The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-7536•United States of America v. William Stephen Javage
99-7536Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 19, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7536
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM STEPHEN JAVAGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CR-95-7, CA-98-64-2)
Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 19, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Stephen Javage, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* The district court granted a certificate of appealability.
2
PER CURIAM:
William Stephen Javage seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of
the hearing on the motion, and the district court’s order and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on reasoning of the
district court.* See United States v. Javage, Nos. CR-95-7; CA-98-
64-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 8, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.