The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-7493•United States of America v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CR-91-429-A
99-7493Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7493
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DEON MAURICE MOSLEY, a/k/a D,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-429-A)
Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 20, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deon Maurice Mosely, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deon Maurice Mosley appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to reconsider. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find that the court
did not abuse its discretion in denying Mosley’s motion. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United
States v. Mosley, No. CR-91-429-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 13, 1999). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.