Anthony Eugene Bailey v. DOCTOR FREUND, Medical Agent of the Richmond City Jail

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7486
ANTHONY EUGENE BAILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR FREUND, Medical Agent of the Richmond
City Jail; LIEUTENANT WOMACK, Assistant Super-
visor, Medical Agent of the Richmond City
Jail; DOCTOR THOMPKINS, Medical Agent of the
Richmond City Jail; CAPTAIN MINION, Super-
visor, Medical Agent of the Richmond City
Jail,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NURSE SMITH; NURSE PARRISH,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-97-924-2)
Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Eugene Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Chandra Dore Lantz,
HIRSCHLER, FLEISCHER, WEINBERG, COX & ALLEN, Richmond, Virginia;
Elizabeth Stanulis Skilling, HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN,
Richmond, Virginia; Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, SANDS, ANDERSON,
MARKS & MILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Eugene Bailey appeals from the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Bailey v. Freund, No. CA-
97-924-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1999). We deny Bailey’s motion for
appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --