The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-7468•Beresford Emerson Dakin-Davis v. JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States
99-7468Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 1, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7468
BERESFORD EMERSON DAKIN-DAVIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United
States,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
99-2366-DKC)
Submitted: April 10, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000
Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Beresford Emerson Dakin-Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dakin-Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the rec-
ord and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the
district court. See Dakin-Davis v. Reno, No. CA-99-23566-DKC (D.
Md. Oct. 1, 1999). Appellant’s motion for bond while his appeal is
pending is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.