David Bright v. C. MOORE, Sgt, CO III, 7 am to 3 pm shift

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7364
DAVID BRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. MOORE, Sgt, CO III, 7 am to 3 pm shift; D.
BAKER, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift; E.
ITNYER, Officer, CO II 7 am to 3 pm shift;
OFFICER POWELL, Co I, 7 am to 3 pm shift; J.
ROSEBERRY, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift;
E. CLARK, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm shift;
J. B. AMBROSE, Officer, CO II, 7 am to 3 pm
shift; SERGEANT MARTIN, CO III 7 am to 3 pm
shift; AL DAVIS, Hearing Officer's Disciplin-
ary Hearing; JOSEPH P. SACHETT, Warden; T.
MUNSON, CO S,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
98-3814-CCB)
Submitted: February 24, 2000 Decided: March 3, 2000
Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
David Bright, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, As-
sistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
David Bright appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Bright v. Moore, No. CA-98-3814-CCB (D. Md.
Nov. 25, 1998 & Sept. 23, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --