The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-7041•United States of America v. Clyde Garcia Cropp
99-7041Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 13, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7041
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLYDE GARCIA CROPP,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CR-95-16, CA-98-630-R)
Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 13, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clyde Garcia Cropp, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clyde Cropp appeals the district court’s orders summarily
dismissing ground one and granting summary judgment to the United
States on ground two of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Cropp, Nos. CR-95-16; CA-98-
630-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 19, 1998; July 22, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.