United States of America v. Guy Anthony Dillard

99-6924Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 17, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6924
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GUY ANTHONY DILLARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CR-93-173)
Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 17, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Guy Anthony Dillard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Guy Anthony Dillard appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for preparation of transcripts at government expense.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Dillard
leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Dillard, No. CR-93-173
(W.D. Va. June 17, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.