George Bernard Wischhusen, Jr v. PATRICK CONROY, Warden

99-6860Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 5, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6860
GEORGE BERNARD WISCHHUSEN, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICK CONROY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR
THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
99-347-S)
Submitted: December 20, 1999 Decided: January 5, 2000
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Bernard Wischhusen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph
Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George Bernard Wischhusen, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254
(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal sub-
stantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Wischhusen
v. Conroy, No. CA-99-347-S (D. Md. June 2, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.