The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-6820•Edward Powell v. D. A. Braxton
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6820
EDWARD POWELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. A. BRAXTON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-522)
Submitted: December 29, 1999 Decided: January 10, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel John Munroe, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Powell appeals the district courts order denying relief
on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See Powell v. Braxton, No. CA-98-522 (E.D.
Va. May 12, 1999). We also deny Powell’s motion for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.