The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-4319•United States of America v. David P. Shurland
99-4319Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 7, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-4319
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID P. SHURLAND,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-98-392)
Submitted: January 31, 2000 Decided: March 7, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherri A. Thaxton, SHERRI A. THAXTON, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellant. Helen Fahey, United States Attorney, Sara E. Flannery,
Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David P. Shurland appeals from a one-day sentence imposed
following his guilty plea to entering a military installation after
having been removed, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1382 (West 1984 & Supp. 1999 ).
We have reviewed the evidence and find that the district court did
not abuse its discretion in denying Shurland’s Fed. R. Crim. P.
32(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea. See United States v.
Moore, 931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm
his conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument be-
cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.