United States of America v. Michael Ray Shifflett

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-4269
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL RAY SHIFFLETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (CR-91-33)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 20, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Ray Shifflett, Appellant Pro Se. Jennie M. Waering, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Shifflett appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to extend the stay of forfeiture on two parcels of land.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shifflett’s motion
to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Shifflett, No. CR-91-33 (W.D.
Va. Apr. 1, 1999). We deny Shifflett’s motions requesting tran-
scripts and to enlarge the record. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --