The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2659•ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Reverend v. UNITED STATES TOBACCO COMPANY (Copenhagen & Social Outfitters)
99-2659Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 15, 2000
* Judge King did not participate in consideration of this
case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2659
ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, Reverend; AMERICAN INDIAN
MINISTRIES; PEGGY LOU BROUGHTON,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES TOBACCO COMPANY (Copenhagen &
Social Outfitters),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-99-3477-WMN)
Submitted: March 9, 2000 Decided: March 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, * Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ellis Harley Barber, Appellant Pro Se.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ellis Harley Barber appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Barber v.
United States Tobacco Company, No. CA-99-3477-WMN (D. Md. Nov. 30,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.