Stuart Hill v. Steven Dunn

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2623
STUART HILL; VICKI HILL,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
STEVEN DUNN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-99-
89-AMD)
Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stuart Hill, Vicki Hill, Appellant Pro Se. William Davidson Evans,
Jr., Senior Assistant County Attorney, Annapolis, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stuart and Vicki Hill appeal the district court's orders
granting summary judgment to the appellee on their 42 U.S.C.A.
§ 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint alleging malicious prosecution
and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Hill v. Dunn, No. CA-99-89-AMD (D. Md. Nov. 8
& 22, 1999). We deny Dunn’s motion to strike the appellants’
informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --