The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2602•Bradley C. Carter v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
99-2602Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 28, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2602
BRADLEY C. CARTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; LOUIS J.
FREEH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-439-3)
Submitted: January 20, 2000 Decided: January 28, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bradley C. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assis-
tant United States Attorney, Deborah C. Stanley, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bradley C. Carter appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendants’ motion to dismiss his complaint filed under the Freedom
of Information Act, the Privacy Act, and the Federal Tort Claims
Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-
soning of the district court. See Carter v. Federal Bureau of
Investigation, No. CA-99-439-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 1999). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.