The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2590•William F. Allen, Jr v. Time Warner Cable
99-2590Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2590
WILLIAM F. ALLEN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TIME WARNER CABLE, et al.; HOWARD STERN SHOW;
JERRY SPRINGER SHOW; CHANNEL 12, WBOY, INCOR-
PORATED CORPORATION, et al.; CHANNEL 5, WDTV,
WITHE-BROADCASTING LOCAL STATIONS; NBC NET-
WORK; CBS NETWORK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-177-1)
Submitted: January 13, 2000 Decided: January 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William F. Allen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William F. Allen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Allen v. Time Warner Cable, No. CA-99-177-1 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 22,
1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.