The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2535•William Lee Richardson, Jr v. State of West Virginia
99-2535Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 29, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2535
WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WILLIAM LEE RICHARDSON, SR.,
Plaintiff,
versus
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-99-79-3)
Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Lee Richardson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint against the state of West Virginia.
We have reviewed Richardson’s complaint and find no reversible
error in the district court’s ruling that Richardson’s claims are
not justiciable. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order
dismissing Richardson’s complaint. See Richardson v. West Vir-
ginia, No. CA-99-79-3 (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 16, 1999). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.