The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
99-2522•Judith E. Caldwell v. United States of America
99-2522Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2522
JUDITH E. CALDWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-99-207-A)
Submitted: May 19, 2000 Decided: June 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Judith E. Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Judith E. Caldwell appeals the district court’s order
(1) granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action
challenging an adverse employment action and raising a claim under
the Rehabilitation Act; and (2) denying her motion for reconsid-
eration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Caldwell v. United States,
No. CA-99-207-A (E.D. Va. Sept. 21 & Oct. 4, 1999). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.